Re: Re: [VOTE][RFC] ZPP Failure on Overflow

On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 22:03 +0000, Andrea Faulds wrote: > Hi! > > We’re now half-way through voting on this RFC, and only three people, two if I’m excluded, > have voted. I realise it’s a rather technical and obscure matter, but I am a little worried by how > few people have voted so far. Three votes is hardly enough to justify a change. > > If you missed the original announcement, hopefully this reminder will reach you. Here it is, > repeated: > > > On 2 Dec 2014, at 21:44, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an important > > prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety in implicit integer parameter > > conversions. > > > > The RFC requires a 2/3 majority, and voting starts today (2014-12-02) and ends in 10 > > days’ time next Friday (2014-12-12). > > > > Please read the RFC carefully. If you have any doubts or queries about the RFC, please > > don’t hesitate to ask me. > > > > The RFC and voting widget can be found here: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/zpp_fail_on_overflow > > Thanks! > > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > Morning Andrea, I think it's okay to assume that people are winding down for the holiday, possibly some people are already on holiday. Because of the time of year, you might want to leave the vote open another week, or until the number of votes justifies the change. Cheers Joe