Re: Consistent function names

From: Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 10:02:43 +0000
Subject: Re: Consistent function names
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-84285@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 04/03/15 00:44, Pierre Joye wrote: > For a php developer point of view, for someone not knowing c or php > internals APIs, I highly recommend > https://github.com/phalcon/zephir Yasuo is pushing function names on the basis of following the coding standard, but again these secondary tools muddy the waters. Zephir allows // comments, something which the PHP guide lines avoid for cross compiler reasons, so if that is a real problem, the Zephir code may not be usable upstream? It would be helpful if there was at least some consistency to the guide lines that we work to rather than having to change rule sets depending on where we are in the tool chain. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

« previous php.internals (#84285) next »