Re: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures

Hi, As a PHP developer, I agree with the possible confusion between -> and ~>. ==> is a better choice IMHO, for its similarity with Hacklang syntax, as said previously. Thanks. *Julien BENOIT* *PHP & JS developer @GuestToGuest <https://twitter.com/GuestToGuest>* Paris, FR. blog.julienbenoit.net <http://fr.linkedin.com/in/jbenoit2011> <http://www.viadeo.com/profile/0021vk9j4z60jp63/> <https://github.com/jbenoit2011> 2015-09-24 8:39 GMT+02:00 Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>: > Changed my vote to "no" after thinking further into it: > > - I don't like the usage of the tilde: -> and > ~> are too similar and > easily confused > - Using ==> would align PHP further to hacklang, which is a > plus > - I'm still conflicted on automatically importing all of the scope into > the closure: while it is working for functional languages, that's where > most of the headaches come from in languages such as javascript. > > Marco Pivetta > > http://twitter.com/Ocramius > > http://ocramius.github.com/ > > On 24 September 2015 at 14:27, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 22, 2015 10:16 PM, "Andrea Faulds" <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > > > > > I am unhappy with the ~> syntax choice. As I've mentioned before, it's > > hard to type for many people, it looks too much like ->, and it's > > unnecessarily different from Hack's ==>, of which this RFC would > otherwise > > be proposing a strict subset. > > > > > > So, I am voting against. > > > > Same reason here. > > > > Thanks, > > Pierre > > >