Re: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures

From: Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:57:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-88473@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Den 2015-09-24 kl. 09:10, skrev Stanislav Malyshev:
Hi!
As a PHP developer, I agree with the possible confusion between -> and ~>. ==> is a better choice IMHO, for its similarity with Hacklang syntax, as said previously.
I'm getting a feeling the RFC could be more successful if syntax was made a choice between ~> and ==> as a voting option. How does one then address that this RFC only covers a subset of
Hacklang functionality when having the same operator? -- //Björn Larsson

« previous php.internals (#88473) next »