Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures
| From: | Pascal MARTIN, AFUP | Date: | Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:33:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-88632@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 22/09/2015 03:59, Bob Weinand a écrit :
Hey, or straight ahead to the vote: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short_closures#vote Thanks, BobHi, After discussing this with other people at AFUP, we would be (a large majority of us) -1 on this RFC. Basically, we feel that: * This could lead to less readable code, mostly because of the usage of an operator (which is not, to some, "the PHP way") and because of the parenthesis / brackets that are optional in some cases * The "~>" operator has less meaning than "function" Keeping the old "function" syntax is, of course, nice and required -- but also means having two possible syntaxes for the same thing, which is less nice. BTW, the "automatically bind variables" didn't come up much in our discussion. And a few mentioned that "~>" could be a bit hard to type and could look a bit too similar to "->". In any case, thanks for your work on this! -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/