Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> since the RFC doesn't look like it will pass, I have a question about >> RFC process - will you be able to "fix" the RFC and submit it for vote >> again with targeting PHP 7.1? > > Yes, but see: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#resurrecting_rejected_proposals > > So, to make another try, the RFC needs to be substantially amended or > resubmitted in 6 months. > >> The biggest issues seem to be >> - ~> operator instead of ==> >> - missing type hints >> - auto imports > > I would say changing these would be substantial. Just changing the > operator - not sure, maybe if it is clear that with this change vote > would pass (which currently isn't clear at all). > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalyshev@gmail.com Seems you are right it's not clear after all; I skimmed through all the e-mails in this thread and found only around 5 people stating that the ~> operator was their reason to vote "no"; while I was writing the previous e-mail, I really thought more people stated that here; on the other hand, we don't know why the rest of those ~30 people voted no, so it's really hard to say. Anyways, thanks for sending the Ressurecting rejected proposals info. :) Regards Pavel Kouřil