Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures

From: Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:07:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-88527@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, On Sa, 2015-09-26 at 10:10 +0200, Pavel Kouřil wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> The biggest issues seem to be > >> - ~> operator instead of ==> > >> - missing type hints > >> - auto imports > > > > > Seems you are right it's not clear after all; I skimmed through all > the e-mails in this thread and found only around 5 people stating that > the ~> operator was their reason to vote "no"; while I was writing the > previous e-mail, I really thought more people stated that here; on the > other hand, we don't know why the rest of those ~30 people voted no, > so it's really hard to say. For what it's worth: My reasons to vote no were a) the general readability, particularly when the parentheses are missing as well as the choice of operator and b) the lack of type declarations. I can see the benefit of auto imports but consider it a break of concepts (habit?) from everywhere else in PHP. Regards, Arne Blankerts -- Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly (Henry Spencer,1987)

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc
« previous php.internals (#88527) next »