Re: Re: why bloated packages are bad (a case for splitting up large packages)
| From: | Clay Loveless | Date: | Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:11:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: why bloated packages are bad (a case for splitting up large packages) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.core |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-core+get-3548@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lukas Smith <lsmith@php.net> wrote:
> In your rather long list you put in all the optional dependencies. If
> you structure your unit tests accordingly then you dont need to download
> the optional dependencies obviously.
Lukas, if you're read bug #5085 prior to writing your response, you'd know
why Greg's unit test was pulling in all the optional dependencies.
Why is it so much to ask for people to actually LOOK at what they're
commenting on before they comment?
In Pierre's most recent responses, it's clear that he still hasn't looked at
the code in question, and is basing his entire argument on misguided
principal -- nevermind the source code.
And now, within the same 24 hour period, Lukas is doing the same thing on a
new topic.
Is it so much to ask, on the PEAR-CORE list in particular, that people say
nothing until they have something informed to say?
-Clay
--
Killersoft.com