Re: Re: why bloated packages are bad (a case for splitting up large packages)

From: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:11:27 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: why bloated packages are bad (a case for splitting up large packages)
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.core 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-core+get-3548@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Lukas Smith <lsmith@php.net> wrote: > In your rather long list you put in all the optional dependencies. If > you structure your unit tests accordingly then you dont need to download > the optional dependencies obviously. Lukas, if you're read bug #5085 prior to writing your response, you'd know why Greg's unit test was pulling in all the optional dependencies. Why is it so much to ask for people to actually LOOK at what they're commenting on before they comment? In Pierre's most recent responses, it's clear that he still hasn't looked at the code in question, and is basing his entire argument on misguided principal -- nevermind the source code. And now, within the same 24 hour period, Lukas is doing the same thing on a new topic. Is it so much to ask, on the PEAR-CORE list in particular, that people say nothing until they have something informed to say? -Clay -- Killersoft.com

« previous php.pear.core (#3548) next »