Re: Re: why bloated packages are bad (a case forsplitting up large packages)

From: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:17:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: why bloated packages are bad (a case forsplitting up large packages)
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.core 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-core+get-3549@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:11:27 -0700 clay@killersoft.com (Clay Loveless) wrote: > In Pierre's most recent responses, it's clear that he still > hasn't looked at the code in question, and is basing his entire > argument on misguided principal -- nevermind the source code. For the last time (take #2), it seems that you have no idea about my reasons. Dependecies prooved to be a bad thing by nature. Adding one only for ErrorStack is not a good idea. Asking people to have to check now for a PEAR version _and_ an ErrorStack version neither. The Greg's idea about putting a single phar archive in PHP release is nice (from a user point of view) but does not solve the QA problems of managing the dependencies before any PEAR release. How hard is it to understand??? And no, the actual code base has _nothing_ to do with my oppositions. Period. --Pierre

« previous php.pear.core (#3549) next »