Re: Category-Proposal: Patterns

> I agree with everything said here however I see one exception being the > MVC framework. Personally I'd like to see more use of the MVC in PEAR > and, if that were to ever happen, an agreed upon approach would be nice. > My assumption would be that such a package would be part of the base PEAR > not a separate module. > > I think these guys are on the right track: > > http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=108 > > I posted a URL to this a while back but got not feedback so either nobody > cared are you all really are against stuff like this in PEAR. > > Like I said, I agree that most patterns are a matter of designing the > application and have no place for PEAR, however, I see the base MVC object > as a possible exception. > > Thoughts? Well, MVC is a way of designing applications, i fail to see what would be such a thing as a base MVC object. There are templates engines and lots of controllers already. As a side note i'm not for or against, i'm just trying to understand the issue ;)) Arnaud.