Re: Package Proposal: DICOM_File
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Mon, 12 May 2003 21:43:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package Proposal: DICOM_File | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16198@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
<paj@pearfr.org> wrote :
> On Mon, 12 May 2003 23:06:34 +0200
> Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote:
>
>> I have looked at the new version and it looks like every control
>> structures are not PEAR CS compliant. You can have a look at them
>> here: http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.control.php
>>
>> I wish I had a preformatted message to send you as well but I couldn't
>> find one, sorry.
>
> And, imho, this kind of "problem" can be fixed later. That cannot be
> something against the package. There are even people around that could
> help Xavier to apply CS once the sources have been commited.
I didn't say I was against the package, did I ?
But I am wondering what's the point of having CS if they are not respected
by PEAR developers. And if it's so easy to have the code cleaned up using
php tools, why can't it be done before committing it to CVS, or even better,
before proposing the code for votes ?
Bertrand Mansion
Mamasam