Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 18:54:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16218@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue May 13, 2003 at 12:4353PM +0100, Davey wrote:
> Agreed, but you mention both phpDoc and phpDocumentor...
PHPDoc is the standard, which defines the style of the API
documentation. phpDocumentor is the tool to parse and evaluate this
documentation.
> it is my
> experience they are not the same thing, and that they can handle more
> than one format of apidoc, during the pear meeting, someone on IRC said
> phpDoc(umentor?) can support the ZDE style apidoc for example, which is
> what I use as standard and would carry on using to make my life easier
> (ZDE Auto-Complete uses the apidoc to show description, args and return
> for each method/class)
I don't think that we should allow another syntax just because some
random IDE supports it.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
http://martinjansen.com/