Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC

From: Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:54:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16218@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue May 13, 2003 at 12:4353PM +0100, Davey wrote: > Agreed, but you mention both phpDoc and phpDocumentor... PHPDoc is the standard, which defines the style of the API documentation. phpDocumentor is the tool to parse and evaluate this documentation. > it is my > experience they are not the same thing, and that they can handle more > than one format of apidoc, during the pear meeting, someone on IRC said > phpDoc(umentor?) can support the ZDE style apidoc for example, which is > what I use as standard and would carry on using to make my life easier > (ZDE Auto-Complete uses the apidoc to show description, args and return > for each method/class) I don't think that we should allow another syntax just because some random IDE supports it. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/

« previous php.pear.dev (#16218) next »