Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
| From: | Alexander Merz | Date: | Wed, 14 May 2003 09:29:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16232@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Wolfram Kriesing wrote:
* i would suggest that examples should be required (but that is actually not part of this RFC, see first note, above). What the user finally does is programming and an example is always something that is quick to look at and mostly easy to understand. Agree, but we should differ between "example" and "some lines of code using the package". We should define some outlines about the meaning of 'example'.Suggestions: - show intented usage of the package - is documented in source (not phpdoc)