Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Wed, 14 May 2003 13:15:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16241@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 14 May 2003 15:13:43 +0200
Björn Schotte <bjoern@thinkphphq.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Wolfram Kriesing wrote:
> > Executive summary (what's the package about, what can it do)
>
> Then I would suggest PowerPoint as an adequate file format. :-)
and windows as a test platform?
> > * Stage 6 - UML diagrams
-1 for UML diagram as a requirement :)
> > * Stage 7 - Design of the application
> > The QA team or an selected team should check a package for it's
> > OO-design and either suggest possible refactoring methods or approve
> >
> > the high quality of the package.
>
> IMHO it shouldn't view on the OO design alone, but also on the
> easy-to-use APIs and perhaps on performance, if possible.
what's about non OO packages? (ok that's (too) rare but...)
pierre