Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
| From: | Greg Beaver | Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 21:32:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16225@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Davey wrote:
Martin Jansen wrote:Packages that are maintained tend to have fewer bugs. The PHPDoc package is not maintained, phpDocumentor is.On Tue May 13, 2003 at 12:4353PM +0100, Davey wrote:Agreed, but you mention both phpDoc and phpDocumentor...PHPDoc is the standard, which defines the style of the API documentation. phpDocumentor is the tool to parse and evaluate this documentation.
http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=97Release date 2002-07-26
http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=137Release date 2003-04-17
I'd like to think that ZDE isn't 'some random IDE'.no, but the choice of its non-standard doc tags is pretty random. It's really too bad, as you will find that the documentation tags are useless for anything but development in ZDE. Greg -- phpDocumentor http://www.phpdoc.org