RE: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
| From: | Daniel Khan | Date: | Wed, 14 May 2003 19:46:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16256@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Markus Wolff wrote
[..]
> Just think the other way round: The PHPDoc syntax is considered to be
> "the standard". phpDocumentor, an open source tool that is available
> for free, already supports this standard. Why should the maintainers
> of this tool bother to support one IDE that doesn´t comply to the
> standard?
>
> Wouldn´t it make more sense to ask Zend to change the way their IDE
> behaves? At least they´re getting paid - by us! - to do it, so we
> should be able to demand such things from them.
I did that some time ago and they asked me something like "What do you mean
with phpdoc syntax?".
I gave up afterwards...
Just my 2 cents
Daniel Khan