Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC
| From: | Davey | Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 21:30:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR Quality (vs. Quantity) RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16226@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
Davey wrote:The only non-standard tag it uses is @desc, it in fact only recognises: @desc @param @return anything else is ignored (so I can put in everything else for apidoc and it will just ignore them). Is it at all possible for phpDocumentor to support that one discrepency as I believe the ZDE is a very liked editor, mainly because its cross platform and it fully supports the PHP syntax... and its auto-complete works off the apidoc :) I am going to test, make sure it can't accept the: /** * description here */ it might just do that, never know, never tried!Martin Jansen wrote:Packages that are maintained tend to have fewer bugs. The PHPDoc package is not maintained, phpDocumentor is.On Tue May 13, 2003 at 12:4353PM +0100, Davey wrote:Agreed, but you mention both phpDoc and phpDocumentor...PHPDoc is the standard, which defines the style of the API documentation. phpDocumentor is the tool to parse and evaluate this documentation.http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=97Release date 2002-07-26http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=137Release date 2003-04-17I'd like to think that ZDE isn't 'some random IDE'.no, but the choice of its non-standard doc tags is pretty random. It's really too bad, as you will find that the documentation tags are useless for anything but development in ZDE.
Greg -- phpDocumentor http://www.phpdoc.org- Davey