Re: Net_Socket -> 1.0.3 ?

Hi! Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:

I know I don't have any real karma on the PEAR lists, but my comment is: this should be rolled as soon as possible; it's not currently possible to do a large number of socket connections with Net_Socket without a segfault, or weird resource behavior (runs out of resources).

I'd love to release it. I guess I'd like feedback on whether or not it should be released as 1.0.3, or as 2.0, or what, since no longer extending PEAR *could* be a BC break if anyone was taking advantage of that fact.

I already had problems with Net_Socket not including PEAR by default when I tested HTTP_Request with current CVS version. Considering the number of packages that depend on Net_Socket, I'd ask their maintainers to test the new version before releasing it...