Re: Adoption of Metabase
| From: | Yavor Shahpasov | Date: | Wed, 21 Nov 2001 03:09:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Adoption of Metabase | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3010@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 16:27, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 November 2001 07:41, Manuel Lemos wrote:
>
> > One thing is certain, I don't want to go where I am not wanted. If
> > there is no interest in integrating Metabase in PEAR, fine. If not, I
> > don't have a problem with that. From the silence of PEAR core
> > developers, I am afraid there isn't much hope from their side to
> > cooperate. At least I made an honest attempt to cooperate.
>
> It will be very nice to have a unique abstraction layer where all of us
> contribute to. But in my opinion to impose MetaBase isn't they way to
> go. PHPLib, ADODB, PEAR DB all are good developments with their
> community and their developers, and trying to drop all of them with
> Metabase is a crazy idea.
>
> The only exit I see of the multi abstraction layers problems is trying
> to join all those communities and start a new development from the
> ground. The code is almost all written so only need to glue it to meet
> the specs of the new resultant layer. Then each team could provide
> their own wrappers to make things easy to their users. That's IMO a
> cooperative behaviour.
>
I a very ideal world this might work, but frankly I don't see this
happening.
yavo