Slowing down Pepr? at least 1 month between proposal/votes
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Wed, 08 Sep 2004 01:20:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Slowing down Pepr? at least 1 month between proposal/votes | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33275@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I just had a look at the proposal for Image_Graphpite, while an interesting and good package, it has gone
* First Draft: 2004-08-30
* Proposal: 2004-08-30
* Call for Votes: 2004-09-07
That's an 8 day review?
- The first comment asked if it could be added / work with Image_Graph.
This would be an ideal solution, but is not going to be feasible to evalutate in 8 days. It would be far better if the authors of Image_Graph had managed to make a comment. - did they wish to merge their work into Image_Graphpite, and call the merged one Image_Graph.. (or visa-versa)
Unfortunatly we know from experience that 1 month is often not enough time for comments.
If someone is willing to commit years of future maintanance to a package, then waiting an extra month before going to votes is perhaps a small inconvenience worth going through.
Regards
Alan