Re: Slowing down Pepr? at least 1 month between proposal/votes

Alexey Borzov wrote:

If you think that the proposal is premature, vote -1 or vote conditionally.

+1 here. A month is a very long time for some packages. I think it is up to the developer to decide when is the right time to call for votes. If you think the package needs more discussion then vote conditionally or better yet let the developer know before they go to CfV. It seems like there is a lot of "Oh I didn't know we were going to vote on this already or else I would have said..." going on lately. Everyone has the same amount of time to voice their opinion about a package. No offense but failure to be heard within a week, I think, is a poor excuse for changing the rules. Dragging out the proposal process isn't going to help PEAR become any better it will just slow down the growth of PEAR. Scott Mattocks