Re: Slowing down Pepr? at least 1 month between proposal/votes

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Alan Knowles wrote: > I just had a look at the proposal for Image_Graphpite, while an > interesting and good package, it has gone > > * First Draft: 2004-08-30 > * Proposal: 2004-08-30 > * Call for Votes: 2004-09-07 > > That's an 8 day review? > > - The first comment asked if it could be added / work with Image_Graph. > This would be an ideal solution, but is not going to be feasible to > evalutate in 8 days. It would be far better if the authors of > Image_Graph had managed to make a comment. - did they wish to merge > their work into Image_Graphpite, and call the merged one Image_Graph.. > (or visa-versa) > > Unfortunatly we know from experience that 1 month is often not enough > time for comments. > > If someone is willing to commit years of future maintanance to a > package, then waiting an extra month before going to votes is perhaps a > small inconvenience worth going through. I agree completely, +1 - Stig