Re: Slowing down Pepr? at least 1 month between proposal/votes

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:20:06AM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote: > > If someone is willing to commit years of future maintanance to a > package, then waiting an extra month before going to votes is perhaps a > small inconvenience worth going through. That's funny, I too was thinking about asking if we should extend the proposal time frame. A week for review and a week for voting is just too fast for proper deliberation and planning. Earlier discussions also prposed the ability to change one's votes. We should build that into PEPr. Hopefully Toby can do that when he gets back. I'm pretty busy with things now. --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409