Re: New Package Procedure?

From: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:55:39 +0000
Subject: Re: New Package Procedure?
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I'm curious about the status of Jesus Castagnetto's Math_Matrix package as well - one of the important steps in going from GPS data to a projected map is to transform, rotate, or scale the points to match a given coordinate system, and matrix transformations are the preferred way of doing this. Is Math_Matrix on the road to a 1.0 release?
[...snip...] Have you encountered a bug in Math_Matrix. AFAIK the only one that has been reported was #884, and that was a PEAR QA requested changed in view of the change in the behavior of get_class().
No, I've not found any bugs - just curious. Is it poor PEAR practice to have one package depend on another that is not at 1.0 yet? I'd like to have the output scaling/rotation/translation be a built-in feature of the Map_Projection core at some point in the future, since it would help transparency and calculation of the inverse functions. ------------------------------------------------------ michal migurski- contact info, blog, and pgp key:
sf/ca            http://mike.teczno.com/contact.html


« previous php.pear.dev (#33818) next »