Re: New Package Procedure?

From: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:10:45 +0000
Subject: Re: New Package Procedure?
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33819@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 14:55, Michal Migurski wrote: > > No, I've not found any bugs - just curious. > > Is it poor PEAR practice to have one package depend on another that is > not at 1.0 yet? I'd like to have the output > scaling/rotation/translation be a built-in feature of the > Map_Projection core at some point in the future, since it would help > transparency and calculation of the inverse functions. Hi No it's fine, you just can't put the state of the package above your deps state :) For example if any of your deps is in state beta, then your package can't go above state beta until all the deps are above beta :-) Regards Helgi

« previous php.pear.dev (#33819) next »