Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_Vpopmaild

From: Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:48:03 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_Vpopmaild
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48404@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Bill Shupp wrote:
On Nov 3, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Till Klampaeckel wrote:
Till Klampaeckel (http://pear.php.net/user/till) has commented on the proposal for Networking::Net_Vpopmaild. Comment: Great idea. Unfortunately, I cannot try this since I don't run Qmail/Vpopmail anymore. But glancing over it, I see this as a very valuable addition. Question though, since I didn't spot a dependency on the PECL extension, are you going to use it anyway (when available) or did you implement this totally independent (, and if so "why")?
Net_Vpopmaild does not use the vpopmail PECL extension. Vpopmail has a new program, vpopmaild, which Net_Vpopmaild talks to over tcp/ip (using Net_Socket). The problem with the PECL extension was that the virtual mail spool still had to be local to the web app using the PECL extension. Also, the web server needed to run as the same user that the vpopmail files were owned by (default is vpopmail:vchkpw). Perhaps I should clarify this in the proposal.
You must have already made the change... It seems clear enough to me. Other than the version number for vpopmail. The current stable version is 5.4.25, and CVS is 5.4.26.
Also, I fixed a couple of bugs in the vpopmaild program that have not been released, so you'd need to grab the source from checkout if you did want to test it. I should clarify that as well.
I will release 5.4.26 as a dev release soon. Rick

« previous php.pear.dev (#48404) next »