Re: Some PEAR remarks

Hello, "Tomas V.V.Cox" wrote: > > So I'm the big guilty here, ok. If you didn't know it, I guess I've > replied almost all the mails Lukas sent to pear-dev with dubts or > suggestions and also I guess I'm one of the little amount of people that > has reviewed the code. Neither you, Stig, Alan nor the rest of the > people (and even Lukas himself) are continuing with MDB. > > Perhaps you missed the mail I sent long time ago about my position on > this proyect: > > Ž > imÆéOÒjŠBúÍf¼http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=101025106308556&w=2 This is very old news. Lukas pearified enough of Metabase to make the proof of concept. > PS.- Please Lukas do not hesitate to tell me if I at some point had > insulted you. Tomas, save us from your hiprocrisy, either stop stalling Lukas or just admit publically that in fact you do not want Metabase to merge in PEAR because you would have to drop your beloved code that you contributed to the current PEAR-DB implementation. Drop the bone! How many faces do you have? I can see two from here: one that says publically that you want to help in the merger of Metabase in PEAR-DB and another that tries desperately to perpetuate the current PEAR-DB implementation. If you would really wanted Metabase code to merge with PEAR-DB you would be helping Lukas to optimize the parts of Metabase that you use to object regarding performance complaints instead of investing on optimizing the current PEAR-DB implementation. Regards, Manuel Lemos