Re: XML_Tree release 2.0.x -> XML_Tree2 release 2.0.x
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Sat, 29 May 2004 21:10:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: XML_Tree release 2.0.x -> XML_Tree2 release 2.0.x | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-1288@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> If there is no BC there is no reason for a new major (in most cases).
> You can easily add additional features in subversions. And afaik we
> decided that we try not to confuse people too much. So we shouldn't
> have:
>
> XML_Tree v1.x
> XML_Tree v2.x
> XML_Tree2 v3.0
> or
> XML_Tree3 v3.0 with no XML_Tree2 at all imho.
The difference between XML_Tree and XML_Tree2 would API modifications. Of course if the developers
wants to have it this way then it is up to him.
I would interpret v2 for XML_Tree as feature enhancements while BC is kept. That is, I can run my
old code without a problem.
Does that make sense ?
Arnaud.