Re: XML_Tree release 2.0.x -> XML_Tree2 release 2.0.x

On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 11:10:55PM +0200, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > > I would interpret v2 for XML_Tree as feature enhancements while BC is > kept. That is, I can run my old code without a problem. That's the plan. Though it didn't really kick into place for this package. Hmmm... While 100% compliance is hard to attain, perhaps we can improve the ratio by creating the ability to email everyone who has a PEAR account. This process would be used to inform everyone of new rules and procedures. Similarly, all new accounts should automatically get an email pointing them to the appropriate URI's for the coding standards, naming conventions, etc. This would eliminate the "I didn't know" excuse and make finding things easier. I guess this also brings up the need to put the finishing touches on the version numbering and package naming RFC's and put them up for votes. Thoughts? --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409