Re: XML_Tree release 2.0.x -> XML_Tree2 release 2.0.x

On Sat, 29 May 2004, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > They are. So: Yes! > > Only for the record, you have to apply this rule only if there is BC > (allowing previous major and current version to work in the same > tree). But it is not a requirement. Err... So is it a requirement if there is BC break or not? Major version number gets pumped up when there is a bc break. I really dont remember when this v2 thing came mandatory. I remember it being discussed but not becoming mandatory rule. Then again, there have been so many confusing "rule" discussions so I might just have missed it. However personally I don't even like the rule. Running different versions of a package can be handled with proper usage of include_path. In the meanwhile there already are packages in PEAR which don't follow the rule, Auth_HTTP for example. -- Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/