Re: Mail bug..

I don't think so. Admitted, there is a BC gap if people suddenly change to 4.3.0. But win32/mail was unstable as hell in every release, so I don't consider this really valid argument. Those interested in compatbility between releases should have used externel classes (== common dominator). I simply don't consider this being worth the trouble, aiming for a consistent win32/mail in 4.3 as good as we can get it with the current resources. On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:29:35PM +0100, Liz wrote : > Woudlnt it be easier to keep old functionality, and change the reply-to > bit to work? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:mfischer@guru.josefine.at] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:30 PM > > To: Liz > > Cc: 'Melvyn Sopacua'; php-qa@lists.php.net > > Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Mail bug.. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:18:03PM +0100, Liz wrote : > > > Personally, given that on win32 it previously DID accept > > just \n, and > > > not necessarily require \r\n, Id say we should fix it for > > all the other > > > people out there who found 4.2.x+ broke things. > > > > > > Especially as the To/From fields work with \n > > > > Maybe .. but the behaviour was broken (e.g. Reply-To: didn't > > work). I re-introduced it, but not breaking with other > > headers, following the documented convention that \r\n is > > required. -- GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc Did I help you? http://guru.josefine.at/wish_en Konnte ich helfen? http://guru.josefine.at/wish_de