RE: [PHP-QA] Mail bug..

Fair enough, but, as someone whos been using the same code since 4.0.2 came out I think it was, Im sure I wont be the only one who will be concerned that that's the attitude.. After all, you asked us to QA it it.. As a tester, I expect to have the same functionality I always did as a rule, ie, we fix things not break more things.. and while you may fix one thing, if you break everyones sites coz they need to go back and recode it.. Given that the reply-to wasn't working before, they wont be using it... Its your call.. but, Id say, the fact its docking 1 character off the end has to be fixable to make it work the way it used to > -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:mfischer@guru.josefine.at] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:41 PM > To: Liz > Cc: 'Melvyn Sopacua'; php-qa@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Mail bug.. > > > I don't think so. Admitted, there is a BC gap if people > suddenly change to 4.3.0. But win32/mail was unstable as hell > in every release, so I don't consider this really valid > argument. Those interested in compatbility between releases > should have used externel classes (== common dominator). > > I simply don't consider this being worth the trouble, aiming > for a consistent win32/mail in 4.3 as good as we can get it > with the current resources. > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:29:35PM +0100, Liz wrote : > > Woudlnt it be easier to keep old functionality, and change > the reply-to > > bit to work? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:mfischer@guru.josefine.at] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:30 PM > > > To: Liz > > > Cc: 'Melvyn Sopacua'; php-qa@lists.php.net > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Mail bug.. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:18:03PM +0100, Liz wrote : > > > > Personally, given that on win32 it previously DID accept > > > just \n, and > > > > not necessarily require \r\n, Id say we should fix it for > > > all the other > > > > people out there who found 4.2.x+ broke things. > > > > > > > > Especially as the To/From fields work with \n > > > > > > Maybe .. but the behaviour was broken (e.g. Reply-To: didn't > > > work). I re-introduced it, but not breaking with other > > > headers, following the documented convention that \r\n is > > > required. > > -- > GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc > Did I help you? http://guru.josefine.at/wish_en > Konnte ich helfen? http://guru.josefine.at/wish_de > > -- > PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >