Re: removal of this list
| From: | Guilherme Blanco | Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:44:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: removal of this list | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.standards |
| Request: | Send a blank email to standards-+get-51@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I was not correctly understanding then.
I thought all arguing here was to keep everyone voting.
So I'm +1 to keep it open to anyone. But we definately need a separate
list only for comittee...
Regards,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Michael J
Burgess<michael@mjburgess.co.uk> wrote:
> Guilherme Blanco wrote:
>
>> I agree and disagree at the same time.
>
>>
>
>> Keep the list moderated and a closed group is bad as it is currently.
>
>> But leave it opened to everyone leads to anarchy.
>
>>
>
>> You refer to the list being opened, but it's curious that ns separator
>
>> was voted by 6 people in a closed IRC room.
>
>> Please don't get me wrong, I do not want to start a flaming discussion
>
>> here. We had a lot of polls too that was considered only people with
>
>> karma on php.
>
>> It's already a representative democracy what you did for ns and phar
>
>> being enabled by default for example. I even voted on it.
>
>>
>
>> What we want it is actually to have a representative democracy. It's a
>
>> closed group that accepts/deny proposals from anyone.
>
>> Considering this, I'm in favor to keep this list closed and moderated.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> If you are *REALLY* in favor to keep democracy, let's find
>
>> representatives then.
>
>> I'm ok for a poll at internals to chose the representative guys of
>
>> standards list.
>
>
>
> I wasnt aware this list had any final say over what goes into the standard,
> not each post counts as a "vote". It is a medium for sharing ideas. The
> board is itself already closed.
>
>
>
> No one i have seen is saying *everyone* can have a *vote*. What is the case
> now, and what should be the case, is that any one can voice their ideas and
> opinions.
>
>
>
> Ideas are a market, with competition, youre trying to create a monopoly and
> that is a very bad idea, for the reasons listed ad nauseam: there are many,
> many instances where the final proposal has taken the time, effort and ideas
> of many people to reach.
>
>
>
> Perhaps you fail to see that youre acting on behalf of PHP, at least this is
> certainly how it will be received: this is a standard From PHP Itself. To
> have the community blocked out is criminal, hypocritical and entirely
> opposed to the spirit which has fostered the growth of PHP.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer
CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant
Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
URL: http://blog.bisna.com
São Paulo - SP/Brazil