Re: removal of this list
| From: | Martin Scotta | Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: removal of this list | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.standards |
| Request: | Send a blank email to standards-+get-52@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
This is going nowhere. ¿what are we talking about?
I'm anxious to start talking about standards, I hope it no take so long...
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Guilherme Blanco <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
> wrote:
> I was not correctly understanding then.
>
> I thought all arguing here was to keep everyone voting.
> So I'm +1 to keep it open to anyone. But we definately need a separate
> list only for comittee...
>
>
> Regards,
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Michael J
> Burgess<michael@mjburgess.co.uk> wrote:
> > Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> >
> >> I agree and disagree at the same time.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Keep the list moderated and a closed group is bad as it is currently.
> >
> >> But leave it opened to everyone leads to anarchy.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> You refer to the list being opened, but it's curious that ns separator
> >
> >> was voted by 6 people in a closed IRC room.
> >
> >> Please don't get me wrong, I do not want to start a flaming discussion
> >
> >> here. We had a lot of polls too that was considered only people with
> >
> >> karma on php.
> >
> >> It's already a representative democracy what you did for ns and phar
> >
> >> being enabled by default for example. I even voted on it.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> What we want it is actually to have a representative democracy. It's a
> >
> >> closed group that accepts/deny proposals from anyone.
> >
> >> Considering this, I'm in favor to keep this list closed and moderated.
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >> If you are *REALLY* in favor to keep democracy, let's find
> >
> >> representatives then.
> >
> >> I'm ok for a poll at internals to chose the representative guys of
> >
> >> standards list.
> >
> >
> >
> > I wasnt aware this list had any final say over what goes into the
> standard,
> > not each post counts as a "vote". It is a medium for sharing ideas. The
> > board is itself already closed.
> >
> >
> >
> > No one i have seen is saying *everyone* can have a *vote*. What is the
> case
> > now, and what should be the case, is that any one can voice their ideas
> and
> > opinions.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ideas are a market, with competition, youre trying to create a monopoly
> and
> > that is a very bad idea, for the reasons listed ad nauseam: there are
> many,
> > many instances where the final proposal has taken the time, effort and
> ideas
> > of many people to reach.
> >
> >
> >
> > Perhaps you fail to see that youre acting on behalf of PHP, at least this
> is
> > certainly how it will be received: this is a standard From PHP Itself. To
> > have the community blocked out is criminal, hypocritical and entirely
> > opposed to the spirit which has fostered the growth of PHP.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer
> CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant
> Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9215-8480
> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> URL: http://blog.bisna.com
> São Paulo - SP/Brazil
>
> --
> PHP Naming Standardization Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Martin Scotta