Re: Re: PHP Licensed GeoIP PECL module proposal
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:40:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP Licensed GeoIP PECL module proposal | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-3981@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
On 7/14/06, Olivier Hill <olivier.hill@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/14/06, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
The problem is not hosting this stuff on their website or sourceforge. The problem is with visibility of the module. How many times has geoip been discussed here?I cannot remember any discussions about it.
I know we don't want the GPL things to be virulant, but in this case, I still don't see how the license exception is different from MySQL.Neither me but I think it was a mistake. It is very good to finally have a clear rule about this problem. Sadly it happened with your extension. Even if I would prefer a solution to make the GPL compatible with the PHP License (or the other way 'round ;)
I liked CPAN. I liked PEAR. I just wish PECL could be that easy, or should I say flexible.In PEAR you will not be allowed to proposed a GPL package either.
Anyway, I'll inform Maxmind that it cannot be included on PECL, even with a license change.You got it wrong. If they change the license to a non GPL license (GPL + exceptions is not possible here either, as explained), then it is fine. Regards, --Pierre