Re: Re: PHP Licensed GeoIP PECL module proposal

From: Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:40:01 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: PHP Licensed GeoIP PECL module proposal
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-3981@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, On 7/14/06, Olivier Hill <olivier.hill@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/14/06, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
The problem is not hosting this stuff on their website or sourceforge. The problem is with visibility of the module. How many times has geoip been discussed here?
I cannot remember any discussions about it.
I know we don't want the GPL things to be virulant, but in this case, I still don't see how the license exception is different from MySQL.
Neither me but I think it was a mistake. It is very good to finally have a clear rule about this problem. Sadly it happened with your extension. Even if I would prefer a solution to make the GPL compatible with the PHP License (or the other way 'round ;)
I liked CPAN. I liked PEAR. I just wish PECL could be that easy, or should I say flexible.
In PEAR you will not be allowed to proposed a GPL package either.
Anyway, I'll inform Maxmind that it cannot be included on PECL, even with a license change.
You got it wrong. If they change the license to a non GPL license (GPL + exceptions is not possible here either, as explained), then it is fine. Regards, --Pierre

« previous php.pecl.dev (#3981) next »