Re: readline extension status?
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:49:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: readline extension status? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-42387@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 14:50 28/12/2000, Kristian Köhntopp wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:Yeah, pretty much. Stallman is being a bit more strict than what he's allowed by law, and says that you can't even distribute *source code* that's compatible with GPL'd code. But as you can see from examples like the DBM module, this approach has no grounds in reality.GDBM is a clone of DBM. It's quite fine that we support it. Hmm, isn't it that you can have the extension in source, but cannot deliver an object containing it with an actual gdbm linkage?gdbm - official GNU
We would have gotten a free license from Monty even if this was under the Microsoft EULA :) Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/There's no problem here. Same here, I believe. The old MySQL license allows use of the old source under the conditions of that old license, but if you link against the new source, it is GPL.mysql - older versions aren't GPL, but current MySQL is pure GPL