Re: ctype function (re?)naming

Prodigious work Zak - well done. This certainly represents a useful initial tidy up. It doesn't break anything and cures many of the 'bad offenders'. In looking through the unchanged function names, the one that screamed 'I am wrong' most loudly was 'velocis_off_autocommit' which appears to set new standards in unusual word order :) As you may have gathered from my previous posts on the subject, I want to aim much higher than this, but as I gather from everyone else's posts, I'm in a small minority. I see no reason for the syntax of PHP being any less than 'very good indeed', so if anyone else is in that minority, without detracting from the work that Zak has proposed, can we keep this discussion thread alive because I'm sure that there must be a way of bolting a clean version of the language onto the existing engine, and surely PHP 5.0 is the landmark for it's introduction. Cheers -- Phil Driscoll Dial Solutions +44 (0)113 294 5112 http://www.dialsolutions.com http://www.dtonline.org