Re: ctype function (re?)naming
| From: | Zak Greant | Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:05:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: ctype function (re?)naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-48111@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Andi wrote:
[snip]
I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this.
> 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if you
did
> the reverse here :)
Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the least amount of
change for the extension. :)
> 4) If we decide to keep the socket functions like their C counterparts
then
> I'd change the following two on your list:
> getsockname -> socket_getsockname() and not socket_get_name()
> getsockopt -> socket_getsockopt() and not socket_get_opt()
Agreed.
> 5) I think define() and defined() are OK as they are on the language
level.
> 6) I think create_function() is OK. There was a long thread which decided
> upon this name. Same for function_exists().
Ok.
--zak