Re: ctype function (re?)naming
| From: | Zak Greant | Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2001 06:28:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: ctype function (re?)naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-48132@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Andi wrote:
> At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
> >Andi wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this.
> >
> > > 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if
you
> >did
> > > the reverse here :)
> >
> >Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the least amount of
> >change for the extension. :)
>
> I think it's a wrong choice. If we're moving to a standard system which
> puts underscores in key places of the name, we shouldn't remove them from
imap.
I certainly don't have *any* problems adding underscores. :) Removing
the
underscores was my best attempt to be moderate. If we can get agreement
on moving imap towards the naming convention, then I am more than happy
to go along!
--zak