Re: Re: ctype function (re?)naming
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Thu, 08 Mar 2001 23:34:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ctype function (re?)naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-48325@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 02:20 PM 3/8/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 22:33 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:No, because gz_ has existed for a long time. If we'd give it a name today we'd probably call it gzip_* but it's too late. We can do the right thing for bzip2. AndiWhy not bzip2_?*** Well, if bzip2_, then gzip_ ! If gz_ then bz_ or bz2_. Am I wrong or too fastidious ?