Re: ctype function (re?)naming
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2001 06:19:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: ctype function (re?)naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-48129@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote: [snip] I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this. 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if you did the reverse here :) Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the least amount of change for the extension. :)I think it's a wrong choice. If we're moving to a standard system which puts underscores in key places of the name, we shouldn't remove them from imap. Thanks, Andi