Re: Re: ctype function (re?)naming

From:	Hellekin O. Wolf	Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2001 14:01:57 +0000
Subject:	Re: Re: ctype function (re?)naming
References:	1	Groups:	php.dev php.qa
Request:	Send a blank email to php-dev+get-48252@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

At 14:36 08/03/2001 +0100, Jani Taskinen wrote:

On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote: At 22:33 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Why not bzip2_?
*** Well, if bzip2_, then gzip_ ! I'd prefer these. Readable is better than saving 2-3 keystrokes. --Jani *** Man ! Please stop associating me with "saving keystrokes" : it was followed by a winking smiley !

Anyway, it's a good thing that we consider our first consensus about renaming functions, namely [ext name]_[function]_[zblah] AFAIK, the Gzip extension is named gzip and not gz. Zak, would you please post an updated version of the renaming scheme, including the last few days changes, so that we can see things more globally ? (And refresh the thread's subject ;-) hellekin