> > > > When you cannot make up your mind, choose consistency. In this
case,
> > > > like it or not, the consistent thing to do is add it.
> > >
> > > I agree. It's very confusing that <?php= doesn't exist.
> >
> >Since nobody really objects to the addition of <?php= tag, why doesn't
> >somebody with the Zend CVS access commits the Yasuo's patch so we can
close
> >this discussion.
>
> Because some people object and there is no consensus right now.
I saw very few objections. Most people agreed that if we have 3 opening tags
like <? <% and <?php we should also have <?= <%= and <?php=. Even more so
because only <?php works on all php installations. Or is my impression
wrong?
Edin