Shane Caraveo wrote:
>
> Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >
> > Implementing this is not a problem but it seems that there is no consensus
> > on adding it.
> > I'm not sure what I think. I was very much against <?= but now it exists
> > and is used by a lot of people it might be good to have <?php= but then
> > again I can't make up my mind :)
> > Andi
>
> When you cannot make up your mind, choose consistency. In this case,
> like it or not, the consistent thing to do is add it. It's odd and
> inconsistent to have <%=, <?=, but not <?php=.
I was also against <?= originally, but now that we do have it I agree
that consistency (symmetry?) is better.
- Stig