Andi Gutmans wrote:
> It seems that most people support <?php=. If no one comes up with a
> convincing argument against I will add <?php= later on today. BTW, I never
> liked the <?= syntax and opposed it at the time but I think today because
> many people seem to like it, it makes sense to have <?php= for consistency
> sake.
Let's put it this way: who cares. It doesn't break any existing code,
does it? As long as nobody is *obliged* to use it...
However I'm still under the impression that it's the wrong solution to
the wrong question.