Shane Caraveo wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Implementing this is not a problem but it seems that there is no
consensus
on adding it.
I'm not sure what I think. I was very much against <?= but now it exists
and is used by a lot of people it might be good to have <?php= but then
again I can't make up my mind :)
Andi
When you cannot make up your mind, choose consistency. In this case,
like it or not, the consistent thing to do is add it. It's odd and
inconsistent to have <%=, <?=, but not <?php=.
I was also against <?= originally, but now that we do have it I agree
that consistency (symmetry?) is better.
Now all that is left is to decide :) I think we're at a deadlock.
Who opposes this strongly?
Andi