Re: <?php= ?> sytanx again

From: Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:34:15 +0000
Subject: Re: <?php= ?> sytanx again
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-70626@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 09:33 AM 11/15/2001 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
Shane Caraveo wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote:
Implementing this is not a problem but it seems that there is no
consensus
on adding it. I'm not sure what I think. I was very much against <?= but now it exists and is used by a lot of people it might be good to have <?php= but then again I can't make up my mind :) Andi
When you cannot make up your mind, choose consistency. In this case, like it or not, the consistent thing to do is add it. It's odd and inconsistent to have <%=, <?=, but not <?php=. I was also against <?= originally, but now that we do have it I agree that consistency (symmetry?) is better.
Now all that is left is to decide :) I think we're at a deadlock. Who opposes this strongly? Andi

Thread (57 messages)

« previous php.dev (#70626) next »