Re: str_ireplace vs. stri_replace

> One little thingie: shouldn't it be called stri_replace() rather than > str_ireplace() ? > You're not the first to voice this opinion. *I* feel str_ireplace is better as it follows the naming convention of <module>_<function>. Others feel stri_replace is better as that follows eregi_replace's style. I have no trouble going with whatever the majority feels is best. Can we get a quick vote? -Pollita