Re: what happened to that new isset() like language construct

From: Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:27:39 +0000
Subject: Re: what happened to that new isset() like language construct
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-10966@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Marc, it somply was far too lat3e in relase process. That's wy we ae all agreed to delay that until 5.1. Also we were very unsure about the name of such an operator....if you can collect all the ideas or can come up with ther perfect one!?! a patch is here: http://marcus-boerger.de/php/ext/ze2/ze2-ifsetor-20040416-4.diff.txt (maybe a little bit outdated) regards marcus Thursday, July 8, 2004, 2:26:31 AM, you wrote: > On 4/15/2004 Jason Garber asked about a new language construct to > simplify testing if a variable isset() and assinging a default value for > those that aren't. The thread title was "Construct Request". > I rember reading it while the discussion went on, I just went back and > browsed through it again. Everyone seemed to agree the it was generally > a good idea and there was some minimal amount of consensus on the ?: > syntax, but I can't tell if this was ever implemented. > Was it? If not did I miss the reason why? > Marc -- Best regards, Marcus mailto:helly@php.net

« previous php.internals (#10966) next »