Re: what happened to that new isset() like language

From: Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:57:13 +0000
Subject: Re: what happened to that new isset() like language
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-10993@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Marc Richards wrote: > Does it? There are other similar constructs that don't e.g. +=, $a ? $b > : $c, .=; These have roots in other languages and as such have a familiarity to them. ?: would be a brand new operator nobody has seen before and one that looks a lot like the ternary operator which everyone knows about. > I think that part of the reason that these things are so terse is > because if would defeat the whole point to use a function name; The aim > is to be concise. No, the aim is not conciseness. That has never been PHP's goal. The aim is clarity. -Rasmus

« previous php.internals (#10993) next »