Re: New construct discussion Summary (was: what happened to that new isset() like language construct)
| From: | George Schlossnagle | Date: | Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:36:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New construct discussion Summary (was: what happened to that new isset() like language construct) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-11126@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jul 12, 2004, at 11:37 AM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Derick, Monday, July 12, 2004, 11:21:06 AM, you wrote:what was wrong with nvl() (of oracle fame)? GeorgeAgreed, and I also like default()The problem with default() is that there will be tons of scripts out there that will be broken by this. Hence i'd like to see a more non intuitive name (like the ifsetor). Probably getvalue() was the best compromise so far.